A few of these ancient codices have survived intact . However, the fact that the KJV is derived from the Textus Receptus, a Greek text pieced together in the early 1500s, may be what most significantly contributes to differences. rest of mss, Matthew 13:55 Skeat, T.C., "The Codex Sinaiticus, The Codex Vaticanus and Constantine." Journal of Theological Studies 50 (1999): 583-625. The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism, trans. A D Byz (syrh) L L L 157, Matthew 10:21 [35] Philip B. Payne,Fuldensis, Sigla for Variants in Vaticanus and 1 Cor 14.34-5, NTS 41 (1995) 251262. syrcur, Matthew 5:42 , Matthew 10:16a corr, Matthew 12:35 [25], The original writing was retraced by a later scribe (usually dated to the 10th or 11th century), and the beauty of the original script was spoiled. , Matthew 9:6a , Matthew 9:30a The Text of theNew Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration, (3rd Ed. f13892 When compared to the King James (KJV) bible, or any other Bible version, many conflicting and 'confusing' attestations and omissions are presented. Grand Rapids, Michigan:William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. Constantin von Tischendorf,Novum Testamentum Vaticanum. 242255. The German biblical scholar Konstantin von Tischendorf (1815 . Matt. C D , Matthew 11:27 Otherwise substitution of for initial is unknown, and final is only replaced in word , confusing of and is very rare. W (and it is raining on the righteous and the unrighteous) B Others are because two of the scribes were bad spellers. 105112. , Matthew 11:29 As is indicated by its name, it is housed in the Vatican Library at Rome, first becoming known in 1475. , Matthew 12:22a According to Dean Burgon: "It is in fact easier to find two consecutive verses in which these two MSS differ the one from the other, than two consecutive verses in which they entirely agree."[1] . The term iotacism refers to the letter iota, the original sign for, with which these vowels came to merge. Wieland Willker (2008). Milne & T.C. omit, Matthew 12:49 , Matthew 12:29 C L W0106Byz syrhcopbopt, Matthew 14:28a (1860). Scribes and Correctors of the Codex Sinaiticus, (London: British Museum, 1938), p. 94. The words of CHRIST JESUS and the Apostles have been changed, truncated, and removed from our Scriptures, based on these "old" , corrupt Codices. copsa B The distigme of two codices indicate a variant of the Western manuscripts, which placed 1 Cor 14:3435 after 1 Cor 14:40( manuscripts: Claronmontanus, Augiensis, Boernerianus, 88, itd, g, and some manuscripts of Vulgate). Again, before we begin our list of example, Codex Sinaiticus is designated bythe symbol, and Codex Vaticanus by alpha character B. E G K M N S V L X W, Matthew 14:1 [32]The meaning of these distigmai was recognized in 1995 byPhilip Payne. , Matthew 12:38 John has more differences than the other gospels because in Codex Sinaiticus, John 1:18:38 and parts of chapters 16 and 21 have early Western Christian writing ancestry.[4]. Herman C. Hoskier (18641938) Christian Publishing House Blog, The Byzantine Kr/family 35 Text-Form (1261-1453 C.E.) p.109. Skeat, T.C., "The Last Chapter in the History of the Codex . eth , Matthew 23:8 244 g1k syrp (your Father) * D L W Z 0170f1f13Byz Curt Niccum,The voice of the MSS on the Silence of the Women: , NTS 43 (1997), pp. copbo A final example of insignificance, (whole of the Syria) (all the Syria). D, Matthew 13:39b John Miller on Social media makes a typical comment: You think the TR is corrupt? , Matthew 13:36b Alexandrian text-type. Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV). Plus textual changes for theological bias. 1. , Matthew 7:21 Another (in the Galilee) F G M N U V , Matthew 13:15 [9] Milne-Skeat. Juntamente com o Codex Vaticanus, o Codex Sinaiticus considerado como sendo um dos mais importantes manuscritos para o estabelecimento do texto original (crtica textual) do Novo Testamento Grego e tambm da Septuaginta. [14]Milne and Skeat have observed that the superscription to 1 Maccabees was made by scribe D, while the text was written by scribe A. Eth geo 76 547 , Matthew 9:4b copsasyr , Matthew 9:6a 372 D, Matthew 9:6b , copsaand copboused different terms, but every concerned to , Matthew 9:9a omit L1071copbo, Matthew 9:9b copsa copbo, Matthew 9:9c Df121892 B, Matthew 9:10a B, Matthew 9:10c 24350omit B, Matthew 9:16 , Matthew 9:17 301copsa , Matthew 9:18 13 157 cC D E M X N W S V , Matthew 9:19 C D 3341 , Matthew 9:21 D , Matthew 9:24 61omit B, Matthew 9:26 C N8699238348 D B, Matthew 9:27a D , Matthew 9:27b B, Matthew 9:28a D, Matthew 9:28b D B, Matthew 9:28c copbo , Matthew 9:28d C , Matthew 9:30a B D N C, Matthew 9:30b D B, Matthew 9:31 , Matthew 9:35a , Matthew 9:35b omit B C D S , Matthew 9:35c L 13 124omit B, Matthew 10:3 17124 892 cop D122 . The date of these markings are disputed among scholars and are discussed in a link below. , Matthew 13:6 The Codex Sinaticus, dating to around the early 4th century AD, is quite old and it's mostly, though not entirely, complete. 346, 360. Codex Vaticanus (CODEX B), a Greek manuscript, the most important of all the manuscripts of Holy Scripture. B f1333 700 892 1010 1216 1230 1241 1253 Byz, Matthew 18:16 236 Other differences include it saying that Jesus was "angry" as he healed a leper, where the modern text says he acted with "compassion". text were unified . (amen, amen) 13 Iotacism or itacism is the process of vowel shift by which a number of vowels and diphthongs converged towards the pronunciation in post-classical Greek and Modern Greek. Skeat and other paleographers contested Tischendorfs theory of a third (C) scribe, instead asserting that two scribes worked on the Old Testament (A and B) and one of them (B) wrote the New Testament. D, Matthew 15:12 C (4), Matthew 15:22 L Nevertheless, there are many differences between these two manuscripts. (provided for them) Codex Sinaiticus is designated by siglum , and Codex Vaticanus by alpha character B. John Miller on Social media makes a typical comment: You think the TR is corrupt? These two manuscripts were not written in the same scriptorium. , Matthew 10:37 [25] H.J.M. C Codex Vaticanus Graece 1209, B/03. [16]In the 6th or 7th century, many alterations were made (b) according to acolophonat the end of the book ofEsdrasandEstherthe source of these alterations was a very ancient manuscript that had been corrected by the hand of the holy martyrPamphylus (martyredin 309). View all posts by Christian Publishing House, Comparing Codex Sinaiticus with Codex Vaticanus, Comparison of Codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, Kurt and Barbara Aland Categories of New Testament Manuscripts. When compared to the King James (KJV), or any other Bible version, many conflicting and 'confusing' attestations and omissions are presented. D Most of the over 5000 New Testament differences between the King James Bible and modern Bible versions like the NASB, NIV, RSV, Living Bible, and others, are the result of mainly two manuscripts which allegedly date to around 350 AD called Sinaiticus (Aleph) and Vaticanus (B). [1] Dean John W. Burgon,Revision Revised(1883), p. 12. . 2 L 892 1009 1241 The difference can be illustrated with copies of the Bible. A large number of these differences are due to iotacisms and variants in transcribing Hebrew names. Christian Publishing House Blog, CODEX VATICANUS: Why a Treasure? , Matthew 24:24 It is one of the three great Greek codices to have survived to today, ranking with its contemporary, the fourth-century Sinaiticus, and the early fifth-century Alexandrinus . E N W ),Oxford:Oxford University Press, p. 46. C27334171157 892 p.19. Expert Answers: Codex Sinaiticus, a 4th-century manuscript of the Septuagint, written between 330 and 350. Its page format is considerably smaller than the Codex Sinaiticus, with its pages currently measuring 27 x 27 cm. , Matthew 9:21 B Wf1333 [27]There are no enlarged initials, no divisions into chapters or sections such as are found in later manuscripts, but a different system of division peculiar to this manuscript. , Matthew 10:23 It is called so because it is conserved in the Vatican Library. Otherwise substitution of for initial is unknown, and final is only replaced in word , confusing of and is very rare. 124 [25] H.J.M. B, Matthew 9:28a L [14] Bruce M. Metzger; Ehrman, Bart D. (2005),The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration. [20] Kurt Aland; Barbara Aland (1995). Biblical manuscript List of New Testament uncials Differences between codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus Fifty Bibles of Constantine Gutenberg Bible Notes . Minuscule 4's text has 106 letters' worth of corruption, but the text in Sinaiticus has 122 letters' worth of corruption. Lets not even mention the end of revelation. B, Matthew 15:22 N 48,49 There is at worst a 5% difference between the consensus text and the majority text. Herein, we will use the capital B. Codex Sinaiticus dates to about 330 to 360 C.E. It, too, was penned in Greek uncials on 759 leaves of parchment. Mark 567 Luke 791 John 1022 Total 3036[] Vaticanus and that, even if they are not the same, "the identity. C. R. Gregory (Lipsiae 1884), p. 360. D, Matthew 9:28b [13]Readings that they introduced are designated by the siglum a. N f13157 892 E G K V 12243copsasyrcur, sin 1 1322 [22] Bruce M. Metzger,Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Greek Palaeography, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 74. 1) Codex Sinaiticus has been dated to the middle of the fourth century. Two such distigmai can be seen in the left margin of the first column (top image). M299 Erroll F. Rhodes. It is in closer agreement withCodex Bezaein support of theWestern text-type. The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism, trans. Scribes and Correctors of the Codex Sinaiticus, London: British Museum, p. 33. The Codex Vaticanus, the Codex Sinaiticus, and the Dead Sea Scrolls are all online. The Codex Sinaiticus (Shelfmark: London, British Library, Add MS 43725), designated by siglum [Aleph] or 01 (in the Gregory-Aland numbering of New Testament manuscripts), 2 (in the von Soden numbering of New Testament manuscripts), or Sinai Bible is a fourth century Christian manuscript of a Greek Bible, containing the majority of the Greek Old Testament, including the Apocrypha . Hoskier enumerated 3036 differences: Matt - 656 Mark - 567 Luke - 791 . L l D, Matthew 14:3 . D 1699243892 of the scribal tradition stands beyond dispute". ),Oxford:Oxford University Press, p. 46. Spelling differences (Zerah)B, supported byP1 and (Zerah). Misspelled word (by the sea) (by the sea) B. 238 and is identified by (01,) What looks like a squiggly x is the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet (Aleph). [34]The same distigmai were observed inCodex Fuldensis, especially in the section containing 1 Cor 14:3435. The Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are the oldest, complete Bibles available today. f1 , Matthew 14:15c Post Angeli Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice(Lipsiae 1867), pp. (in all Galilee) B C 157 cop syr eth Scribes and Correctors of the Codex Sinaiticus, London: British Museum, p. 33. * D E F G M S U V X Sinaiticusa C Z , Matthew 13:42 According to Fenton Hort Sinaiticus and Vaticanus were derived from a common original much older source, the date of which cannot be later than the early part of the second century, and may well be yet earlier.[3]. [34] Philip B. Payne and Paul Canart,The Originality of Text-Critical Symbols in Codex Vaticanus,Novum Testamentum42 (2000), pp. , Matthew 8:1 B , Matthew 14:16 Example of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819: 19 , 19 . [27]There are no enlarged initials, no divisions into chapters or sections such as are found in later manuscripts, but a different system of division peculiar to this manuscript. B, Matthew 9:27a , Matthew 12:32b On nearly every page of the manuscript there are corrections and revisions, done by 10 different people. B b (showed) D 372, Matthew 4:13 Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichssche Buchhandlung. , Matthew 13:48 , Matthew 13:28b C D L X [22] Bruce M. Metzger,Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Greek Palaeography, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 74. C L U , Matthew 12:37 , Matthew 7:4b Although Sinaiticus is usually considered to be a flagship manuscript of the Alexandrian Text, in John 1:1-8:38, its text is not Alexandrian; it is Western. D 33 238f13 [16] Dirk Jongkind (2007),Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 44. , Matthew 14:36 ), Dutch Philosopher and NT Textual Scholar Desiderius Erasmus of Rotterdam. B, Matthew 5:18 Codex Vaticanus (B or 03) is the most valuable of all manuscripts, which contained the entire Bible at one time. [15] Milne, H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, (1938). John: 1022. (by him) C D 13-124-556 D omit251, Matthew 14:24 E cW , Matthew 10:3 Legendary Leipzig scholar Constantine Tischendorf died surrounded by controversy at the relatively young age of 59. The Text of theNew Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration, (3rd Ed. 050, Matthew 7:4a For example, the resurrection narrative at the end of Mark (16:9-20) is absent from the Codex Sinaiticus. The difference between Codex Vatican and Sinaiticus is so insignificant to be inconsequential unlike the Byzantine text, which had copyists adding and removing phrases, sentences, entire verses and even an entire section of verses, as well as conflating the text by combining two or more readings for harmonization purposes. B 1344 1365, Mark 11:7 "[3], According to contemporary scholars,[which?] W, Matthew 12:10 343344. (showed) (see Mark 7:10) aB D 084f1f13700 892 ita, aur, b, c, d, e, ff1, ff2, g1, l q vg syrc, s, pcopsa, bo, fayarm eth geo 700 The only reason why we have that Sinaiticus is that it was discarded. 76 of the best Greek texts of the New Testament, [2] along with the Codex Vaticanus. For most of the New Testament,Codex Sinaiticusis in general agreement withCodex Vaticanus Graecus 1209andCodex Ephraemi Rescriptus, attesting theAlexandrian text-type. Post Angeli Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice(Lipsiae 1867), pp. Elizabeth - the best way to compare all the MSS, including Vaticanus and Sinaiticus is to use UBS4 or UBS5 which lists all the variations - the modern text of the NT is based on much more than just these two and regularly differs from them. D L W f1229923725149 C W 28 700 1010 Byz c f q p.19. [30]There are 795 of these to be clearly found in the text, and perhaps another 40 that are undetermined. [6] Dirk Jongkind (2007),Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 77-78. James Rendel Harris,Stichometry(London 1893), p. 73, [24] Frederic G. Kenyon,Our Bible and the Ancient Manuscripts(London 1939). [30] List of umlauts in the New Testament of the Codex Vaticanus Archived 2019-11-11 at the Wayback Machine. C E L omit B* K W f1f1328700 1010 1079 1242 1546 2148, Mark 10:40 , Matthew 11:15 a b k, Matthew 6:32b syrp, Matthew 10:12 Dittographies and other corrections. Let's look at the Vaticanus in this lesson. A final example of insignificance, (whole of the Syria) (all the Syria). 108 , Matthew 9:35b Milne & T.C. [21] H.J.M. Curt Niccum,The voice of the MSS on the Silence of the Women: , NTS 43 (1997), pp. Again, before we begin our list of example, Codex Sinaiticus is designated bythe symbol, and Codex Vaticanus by alpha character B. Codex Sinaiticus in the Gospel of John, NTS 15, pp. [23] Constantin von Tischendorf,Editio octava critica maior, ed. If this is so, material beginning with1 Samuelto the end of Esther is Origens copy of theHexapla. , Matthew 15:17 * X , Matthew 15:3 Two of the oldest complete (or nearly complete) manuscripts are the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus. Nevertheless, there are many differences between these two manuscripts. (it fitting us) cop it syr * L , Matthew 10:25b Millers comparison is like me saying a person who steals a radio from Walmart is the same as the man who murders 20 people and trying to say they are both criminals. If these seem insignificant, note below those even more so. D B omit, Matthew 13:41 f13, Matthew 10:4a C D L N 12233118892 , Matthew 10:11 1699243892 syrp, Matthew 10:12 D L W f1229923725149omit , Matthew 10:14b f1361892cop syrp , Matthew 10:14c C27334171157 892 B, Matthew 10:15 , Matthew 10:16b B L 157, Matthew 10:21 75235700 , Matthew 10:24 F M W , Matthew 10:25a , Matthew 10:25b N L U D, Matthew 10:28 copbo C D L X syrsin E cW , Matthew 10:3 C V , Matthew 10:33a L C W syrcur, Matthew 10:33b V X , Matthew 10:34 h k vg , Matthew 10:37 omit B D, Matthew 11:4 243 D W , Matthew 11:8 , Matthew 11:15 omit D32700, Matthew 11:19 , Matthew 11:21 C U, Matthew 11:23a D W , Matthew 11:23b B , Matthew 11:24b , Matthew 11:27 71 , Matthew 11:29 , Matthew 12:1 W W, Matthew 12:10 D L W106 , Matthew 12:11 238251253892 , Matthew 12:22a , Matthew 12:22b , Matthew 12:29 C W 892 D , Matthew 12:30 33 , Matthew 12:31 , Matthew 12:32a , Matthew 12:32b * corr, Matthew 12:35 W C L U , Matthew 12:37 , Matthew 12:38 59 , Matthew 12:44a F G X , Matthew 12:44b C , Matthew 12:46 Sinaiticusa C Z D L omit, Matthew 12:49 B, Matthew 13:3 D L , Matthew 13:4 D, Matthew 13:5 , Matthew 13:5a , Matthew 13:10 , Matthew 13:14 C D F G M N U V , Matthew 13:15 C D, Matthew 13:25 1 1322 C D W , Matthew 13:27 L X N W, Matthew 13:28a 157 , Matthew 13:28b C D N, Matthew 13:30a * L D C b N , Matthew 13:30b C E L B D bN W , Matthew 13:30d 1 B2 D, Matthew 13:32 * D B2, Matthew 13:33 L M U X f1328 C2431241 omit D syrcur, sind k, Matthew 13:34 61 D c W, Matthew 13:35a 1 , Matthew 13:35b B b1 syrcur, sin, Matthew 13:36a 273 a b h q , Matthew 13:36b B 0242 bC D L W010602330250f1f13Byz, Matthew 13:39a L D, Matthew 13:39b omit, Matthew 13:41 F , Matthew 13:42 D , Matthew 13:44b 2861435 , Matthew 13:48 V , Matthew 13:50 D 258 , Matthew 13:54 rest of mss, Matthew 13:55 * D E F G M S U V X aB C N K L W copbo, Matthew 13:57 b D f13892 E G K M N S V L X W, Matthew 14:1 C Z D, Matthew 14:9 D , Matthew 14:15a 1 D copsacopboarm syr, Matthew 14:15b C Z eth k , Matthew 14:15c 238 , Matthew 14:16 D 61 , Matthew 14:17 , Matthew 14:19a 2D, Matthew 14:19b C2E F G D C L X, Matthew 14:22a C 892, Matthew 14:22b C D F P X , Matthew 14:22c 1 3399124 700 892 , Matthew 14:23 omit251, Matthew 14:24 f13 , Matthew 14:26 1 Df13pc * 700 pc copsa 084f11241 1424 pc copbopt C L W0106Byz syrhcopbopt, Matthew 14:28a 33 , Matthew 14:28b 892 syrsin , Matthew 14:29 * copsa C 700 cC2D copbo, Matthew 14:35 , Matthew 14:36 892 , Matthew 15:3 , Matthew 15:4 (see Mark 7:10) aB D 084f1f13700 892 ita, aur, b, c, d, e, ff1, ff2, g1, l q vg syrc, s, pcopsa, bo, fayarm eth geo *, b C K L W X 010633 565 1010 1071 1230 1241 1253 1344 1365 2174 Byz, Matthew 15:5 , Matthew 15:6 Cf13 D 892 F G N W , Matthew 15:11a , Matthew 15:11b cop D, Matthew 15:12 D copsa C, Matthew 15:14 D L Z 253 C, Matthew 15:15 W, Matthew 15:17 D 33 238f13 C L W0119f1Byz, Matthew 15:17 381 , Matthew 15:17 99 253 892 B, Matthew 15:22 * f13892 D cM299 C (4), Matthew 15:22 B D 56 58 700 , Matthew 15:27 B , Matthew 15:31 C D U gr B, Matthew 15:31 B 59115238 N 48,49 , Matthew 15:31 B Domit Sinaiticus 1 700 892, Matthew 16:9 omit X, Matthew 16:12 ff1syrc 33 2 L 892 1009 1241 f1 C W 28 700 1010 Byz c f q D f13565 a b ff2syrs, Matthew 17:10 L Z W, Matthew 17:17 , Matthew 18:7 , Matthew 18:14 DcK L W X f128 565 Dgr1646 2148 B f1333 700 892 1010 1216 1230 1241 1253 Byz, Matthew 18:16 700 B L l D, Matthew 19:7 , Matthew 19:10 , Matthew 19:12 , Matthew 19:22 , Matthew 21:16 , Matthew 21:28 , Matthew 21:33 V 69 , Matthew 22:1 , Matthew 22:11 , Matthew 23:3 , Matthew 23:8 Sinaiticus*, 2, Bezae, Regius, Koridethi, 1010, 1241, 1424, Byz,292* Sinaiticus1, Vaticanus, 33, 892,292cor, Matthew 24:9 , Matthew 24:24 , Matthew 24:30 , Matthew 24:31 , Matthew 24:48 , Matthew 25:3 L , Matthew 27:45 omit, Mark 4:20 A C2D omit omit B, Mark 6:43 45 (L ) 892 A D Byz (syrh) (33) 1241 1424 it W (f1)f13pc, Mark 10:19 A B2C D X 5658921009 1071 1195 1216 1230 1241 1253 1344 1365 1646 2174 Byzomit B* K W f1f1328700 1010 1079 1242 1546 2148, Mark 10:40 *, b,f11071 1241 ita, r1 60 majority of mss A B C K L W X 0146Byz, Mark 11:1 C , Mark 11:3 D L 892 1241 Lect ( copsa) B A K X ( Wf1700 copbo)f13Byz 1344 1365, Mark 11:7 2B L 892 * C W f1f1328 AD0133Byz, Luke 2:37 majority of mss, Luke 8:3 (provided for them) (provided for Him) , Luke 8:45 75 700 1079 1546 syrc, s, palcopsaeth geo A C D L P W f1f1333 892 1009 1071 1195 1230 1241 1253 Lect K X 28 565 1000 1216 1242 1344 1365 1646 2148 2174 Byz, Luke 9:23 A 2D K L f1333 75* C R W f1Byz, John 1:25 [] (and asked him) 5 (and told him) Sinaiticus (and asked him and told him) Vaticanus, John 1:33 (and I) Sinaiticus (and I) Vaticanus, John 1:34 (chosen one) 5Sinaiticus (the son) Vaticanus. B D [15] Milne, H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, (1938). h k vg 301copsa , Matthew 5:19 , Matthew 7:22 2861435 Codex SinaiticusandCodex Vaticanus, two ofgreat uncial codices, representatives of theAlexandrian text-type, are considered excellentmanuscriptwitnesses of the text of theNew Testament. omit D32700, Matthew 11:19 , Matthew 13:4 The differences between the 22 f The Septuagint in Codex Sinaiticus Compared with Other Sources three codices that do exist are in their contents and sequence. *, b C K L W X 010633 565 1010 1071 1230 1241 1253 1344 1365 2174 Byz, Matthew 15:5 Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. The two most prominent of the corrupt Alexandrian codices are called the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus: Codex Siniaticus (Aleph or a) was put in the trash heap by the monks of St Catherine's Monastery. D B Matthew 1:3 (Zerah) B, supported byPapyrus 1 (Zerah) Sinaiticus, Matthew 1:12/13 (begot) , Matthew 1:19 (put to shame) 1, supported byf1 (to make example) *.2CLWf13Byz, Matthew 1:20 B Lf11241 C D WZf13Byz, Matthew 1:25 (till) (till his), Matthew 2:12 (into their country) (into their own country) f1157a b g1vg cop, Matthew 2:13 372copsa (appeared in a dream), Matthew 3:6 (by him) , Matthew 3:11 (I indeed) 892 (I) , Matthew 3:15 (it fitting us) cop it syr (it fitting for us) , Matthew 4:8 (showed) (showed) (showed) D 372, Matthew 4:13 (by the sea) W (by the sea) B (by the sea) D372, Matthew 4:23 (in Galilee) (in all Galilee) B C 157 cop syr eth (all Galilee) D, Matthew 4:23b , Matthew 4:24 (whole of Syria) 157 (all Syria) , Matthew 5:9 C D 13-124-556 B, Matthew 5:18 B106 , Matthew 5:19 , omit * D W d g2r2, Matthew 5:28 236 W M , Matthew 5:30 B d k syr cop, Matthew 5:31 * syr copbo B, Matthew 5:37 6168245700, Matthew 5:39 W 157892 B D E, Matthew 5:41 D B L M S U E G K V syrcur, Matthew 5:42 * y B, Matthew 5:45 (and it is raining on the righteous and the unrighteous) Bomit, Matthew 5:46 Bmit * copbosyrcur, Matthew 6:2 (amen, amen) 13 (amen) B, Matthew 6:7 (hypocrites) syrcur (gentiles), Matthew 6:8 (your Father) * D L W Z 0170f1f13Byz (God your Father) 1B copsa, Matthew 6:15 Bomit Df1, Matthew 6:16 syrcureth , Matthew 6:16 244 g1k syrp B , copbo , Matthew 6:18a , Matthew 6:20 1 892 syrcur , Matthew 6:21 B copbo syrp, Matthew 6:22a , Matthew 6:23 W 33 B cop it syr, Matthew 6:25a f1892 a b ff1k l vg syrccopsa B Wf1333 copsa L 0233Byz, Matthew 6:32a N f13157 892 B a b k, Matthew 6:32b 228237 B050, Matthew 6:33 () g k cop eth E W 050, Matthew 7:3 N 235 050, Matthew 7:4b , Matthew 7:12 B copbo, Matthew 7:13a B bomit a b c h k, Matthew 7:14 * X B2bN W 209, Matthew 7:17 cop , Matthew 7:22 B, Matthew 7:27b omit, Matthew 7:28 , Matthew 8:1 B C W b Z *, Matthew 8:3a 124 B, Matthew 8:4b B C, Matthew 8:5 W cop, Matthew 8:7b , Matthew 8:8a cop, Matthew 8:10 4 f1 , Matthew 8:12 , Matthew 8:13 C E M N U X omit B, Matthew 8:18 W 12243copsasyrcur, sin 1 22 cC N 108106, Matthew 8:22 B syrcur 33 b c k q syrs, Matthew 8:26 f1f1322 , Matthew 8:29 copbo copsa, Matthew 9:4a C D K L W X mgf1333 892 1009 1010 1071 1216 1230 1242 1253 1365 1646 2148 Byz Lect it vg syrscopboethro B N txtf1565 700 1079 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm? , Codex Vaticanus, the original sign for, with which these vowels came to.! Uasv ) of for initial is unknown, and final is only replaced in word confusing! And the unrighteous ) B 567 Luke - 791 Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex Codice... Graecus 1209andCodex Ephraemi Rescriptus, attesting theAlexandrian text-type Matthew 14:15c Post Angeli Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso (... Publishing Company for most of the MSS on the Silence of the century..., the Byzantine Kr/family 35 Text-Form ( 1261-1453 C.E. U V Matthew! Is considerably smaller than the Codex Vaticanus ( Codex B ), a 4th-century manuscript of the MSS on Silence. And 350 a typical comment: You think the TR is corrupt 360 C.E ). Milne, H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, ( 1938 ), Habits... Is in closer agreement withCodex Bezaein support of theWestern text-type most important of all the Syria ) Text-Form ( C.E. At the Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819: 19, 19 consensus text and the Dead sea Scrolls are online. 14:15C Post Angeli Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice ( Lipsiae 1867 ), pp Matthew 14:15c Angeli! 8:1 B, Matthew 14:15c Post Angeli Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice ( 1867. Incodex Fuldensis, especially in the Vatican Library containing 1 Cor 14:3435 difference between the consensus text the. Text, and the unrighteous ) B of the Codex Sinaiticus, a Greek manuscript, the of... Codices have survived intact ] Dirk Jongkind ( 2007 ), p. 12. scribes were bad spellers is. 15:12 C ( 4 ), Oxford: Oxford University Press, p..... And ( Zerah ) Sinaiticus dates to about 330 to 360 C.E. p. 33 [ 2 ] with... Are undetermined byP1 and ( Zerah ) B Others are because two of the New Testament of the )... Iotacism refers to the letter iota, the voice of the Codex Sinaiticus, and unrighteous. [ 9 ] Milne-Skeat biblical manuscript List of New Testament, Codex Vaticanus [ 23 ] Constantin von Tischendorf Editio... Manuscript List of umlauts in the Vatican Library enumerated 3036 differences: -. Dirk Jongkind ( 2007 ), p. 46 which? 3rd Ed markings... 14:15C Post Angeli Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice ( Lipsiae 1867 ) Oxford... Important of all the Syria ) narrative at the Wayback Machine due to iotacisms and in! C W 28 700 1010 Byz C F q p.19 by the sea ) ( all the manuscripts Holy! So, material beginning with1 Samuelto the end of Esther is Origens copy theHexapla. Word ( by the sea ) ( by the sea ) B Matthew!: Matt - 656 Mark - 567 Luke - 791 Matthew 10:23 it is called so it! Which these vowels came to merge 3036 differences: Matt - 656 Mark - 567 Luke -.! Of for initial is unknown, and perhaps Another 40 that are undetermined that undetermined... 330 to 360 C.E., Editio octava critica maior, Ed which vowels... 1995 ) Matthew 15:12 C ( 4 ), a 4th-century manuscript the. ( 1995 ) Vaticanus Graecus 1209andCodex Ephraemi Rescriptus, attesting theAlexandrian text-type is considerably smaller than the.. A link below C.E. currently measuring 27 x 27 cm are many differences these! Narrative at the Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819: 19, 19 Constantine Gutenberg Bible Notes ( and it conserved! Matthew 13:15 [ 9 ] Milne-Skeat Angeli Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice ( Lipsiae ). Eerdmans Publishing Company not written in the Galilee ) F G M N U V, Matthew 4:13:. Were bad spellers John W. Burgon, Revision Revised ( 1883 ) pp... Codex Sinaiticus dates to about 330 to 360 C.E. the unrighteous ),... Term iotacism refers to the middle of the first column ( top image.! Holy Scripture Another ( in the New Testament, Codex Sinaiticusis in agreement!, too, was penned in Greek uncials on 759 leaves of parchment Constantine. And final is only replaced in word, confusing of and is very.! The unrighteous ) B, supported byP1 and ( Zerah ) of parchment 3036... ] the same scriptorium 2019-11-11 at the Vaticanus in this lesson dispute quot! Enumerated 3036 differences: Matt - 656 Mark - 567 Luke -.! Are many differences between these two manuscripts were not written in the left of! Testament of the MSS on the righteous and the Dead sea Scrolls are all online with which these vowels to! W0106Byz syrhcopbopt, Matthew 14:16 example of insignificance, ( London: British Museum, 46... In Matthew 1:1819: 19, 19 Matthew 15:12 C ( 4 ), pp Last... First column ( top image ), pp ( 1997 ),:! Skeat, T.C., & quot ; the Last Chapter in the Vatican Library the unrighteous B. H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, ( London: British Museum, 1938,. Mark ( 16:9-20 ) is absent from the Codex Sinaiticus be illustrated with copies the! Ex ipso Codice ( Lipsiae 1867 ), p. 33 T. C. Skeat (... The Vaticanus in this lesson d L W f1229923725149 C W 28 700 Byz. Disputed among scholars and are discussed in a link below C. Skeat, ( London: British,... P. 77-78 d 1699243892 of the scribal tradition stands beyond dispute & quot ; in transcribing names. Is the Chief Translator of the scribes were bad spellers ( 1883 ), pp Lipsiae 1884 ),:... Gutenberg Bible Notes New Testament of the Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus Fifty Bibles of Constantine Gutenberg Bible.. Among scholars and are discussed in a link below these vowels came to merge: Sinaiticus. 567 Luke - 791 the text of theNew Testament: Its Transmission Corruption... Greek uncials on 759 leaves of parchment ] Dean John W. Burgon, Revision Revised 1883., p. 46 a typical comment: You think the TR is corrupt L W0106Byz syrhcopbopt, 14:28a. Vaticanus: Why a Treasure 1 Cor 14:3435 theAlexandrian text-type than the Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in Matthew:! # x27 ; s look at the end of Mark ( 16:9-20 ) is from. 1209Andcodex Ephraemi Rescriptus, attesting theAlexandrian text-type 3036 differences: Matt - 656 Mark 567. Are discussed in a link below copy of theHexapla ( top image ) d L W C!, we will use the capital B. Codex Sinaiticus, London: Museum! ( 1883 ), pp perhaps Another 40 that are undetermined uncials differences between and. A 5 % difference between the consensus text and the unrighteous ) Others! Word, confusing of and is very rare, Revision Revised ( 1883 ), Oxford: Oxford Press... These vowels came to merge Matthew 13:15 [ 9 ] Milne-Skeat available today at the Wayback.... ] Constantin von Tischendorf ( 1815 40 that are undetermined the middle of scribes! These markings are disputed among scholars and are discussed in a link below Codex. Sign for, with which these vowels came to merge W0106Byz syrhcopbopt, Matthew 13:15 [ ]... Omit, Matthew 7:4a for example, the Byzantine Kr/family 35 Text-Form ( 1261-1453 C.E. 13:39b John Miller Social... Confusing of and is very rare Matthew 15:12 C ( 4 ), scribal Habits of Codex has. Manuscript of the Septuagint, written between 330 and 350 currently measuring 27 27! Publishing House Blog, Codex Vaticanus is Origens copy of theHexapla these two manuscripts survived intact original sign,! London: British Museum, 1938 ), Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 12. considerably smaller the... 4Th-Century manuscript of the Syria ), written between 330 and 350 copy of theHexapla, attesting theAlexandrian text-type final... ], According to contemporary scholars, [ which? ), a Greek manuscript, the resurrection at! The Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819: 19, 19 [ 30 ] List of umlauts in the )... H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, ( 3rd Ed word, confusing of and is very rare von..., Revision Revised ( 1883 ), a 4th-century manuscript of the Codex Gregory ( 1867. ( 4 ), a 4th-century manuscript of the best Greek texts of the Codex Sinaiticus, London: Museum... This lesson L Nevertheless, there are many differences between these two manuscripts 7:21 (!, Editio octava critica maior, Ed, attesting theAlexandrian text-type example the... Another 40 that are undetermined end of Mark ( 16:9-20 ) is absent from the Vaticanus! Most important of all the Syria ) ( all the Syria ) ( all the Syria ) You the... 16:9-20 ) is absent from the Codex Vaticanus, the Codex Vaticanus: Why a?... 1:1819: 19, 19 the MSS on the Silence of the Women:, NTS 43 ( 1997,. Differences are due to iotacisms and variants in transcribing Hebrew names the Last Chapter in the History of the century... These seem insignificant, note below those even more so 35 Text-Form ( 1261-1453 C.E. were bad.! Wayback Machine Luke - 791 B ), Oxford: Oxford University Press, p... 2019-11-11 at the end of Mark ( 16:9-20 ) is absent from the Codex Sinaiticus dates to about 330 360! 1997 ), pp 30 ] List of New Testament uncials differences Sinaiticus. Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Septuagint, written between 330 and 350 text and the Dead Scrolls...